Update: Wonderful phono section. Neutral and musical, very unassuming, unspectacular and natural.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3bb9/f3bb9f44b8c220cb7cdd71b21e1adcd74419c5d8" alt=""
In the late seventies and early eighties, a handful of british magazines (Hifi Choice, What Hifi? etc.) had a lot of influence on the growing budget high end. They recommended a source down approach that often employed an expensive
Linn Sondek turntable with a budget amp (most famously the
NAD 3020) and inexpensive speakers (often smaller Missions like
700s)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2629e/2629ebb9b12ac1ea4238c5c39e666e9c8fd4a3c7" alt=""
The magazines would have liked to recommend a british amp in my example system, but there was not one better than NAD at the price point.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d567/4d567fc6ee65c952e60681819714f4096d22845e" alt=""
If one could afford a step up from the NAD, this A&R Cambridge A60 was considered the way to go. It's a high current design, rated at 30 watts/channel (compared to the 3020 at 20 watts/channel on paper...40 in the real world). The design is simple and elegant, the teak case is stunning, the transformer is massive.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a49d/2a49da2e1167e3b194f4b14f67fd96ab8fb2b993" alt=""
It sounds great too. So far I haven't checked out the phono stage, but I will be shortly.
Email me.
2 comments:
I remember this amp! oh and yeah, I'm sure you're aware A&R Cambridge = ARCAM right?
I'm listening to an A60 as I type this. It's being driven by an AppleTV through a Fiio D/A converter and driving a pair of Spica TC-50s.
Post a Comment